The multitude
of stylistic devices that David Mitchell uses in Cloud Atlas truly makes the novel one of a kind. In the section
titled “The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish,” the main character, Tim
Cavendish, directly addresses the reader throughout the section as well as
sharing many of his sarcastic observations. This allows the reader to gain a
more personal connection with Cavendish, causing the reader to feel greatly
distraught when poor Tim finds himself trapped in a retirement home. When the
story transitions to “An Orison of Sonmi-451,” the story is told through an interview.
I was skeptical how the story could capture my interest, being told in such a
flat format; surprisingly the interview allows the reader to explore each
detail of Sonmi’s tale. Yet each section ends without a conclusion drawing the
reader into the following section to discover new characters and connections.
The manner in
which Cavendish directly addresses the reader allows for a personal connection to
be developed with his character. Rather than attempting to hide embarrassing pieces
of his “ghastly ordeal,” he discusses his embarrassments with a sarcastic tone
trying to draw a laugh out of the reader. Even the title is sarcastic.
Cavendish agrees that it“[…] is a sappy title,” (147) as his story is more
unfortunate than it is ghastly. When Cavendish’s home is being invaded by only
three men he says “[…] the door [flies] in off its hinges! I was thinking
al-Qaeda, I was thinking ball lightning, but no” (153). His sarcasm is amusing as
well as the manner in which he directly engages the reader by noting intriguing
elements of his tale. He states how “(You’ll notice, I am always attacked in
threes” (153). Mitchell’s use of these techniques draws the reader closer to
Cavendish, which strengthens the reader’s reaction to his imprisonment in the
Aurora home. The three angry men seek a piece of the fortune that Cavendish
reaps after their brother murders a harsh critic. The murder draws a great deal
of attention to his novel. In his flight from the three brothers Cavendish
encounters a series of unfortunate events. The train that he is riding breaks
down, forcing him to look for places to stay. He subsequently searcher for
alternative ways to reach what he believes is a safe place his brother has found
for him to stay. After reaching the “hotel” Cavendish collapses and immediately
falls asleep; yet, he “[... awakes] to discover a not-so-young woman with a pageboy
haircut rifling through [his] personal effects like a bargain hunter” (173). He
exclaims “‘What the ruddy hell are
you doing in my room, you pilfering warty sow” (173). The woman “[…] put[s] down
[his] jacket without guilt. ‘Because you are new I will not have you eat soap
powder. This time. Be warned. I do not stand for offensive language in Aurora
House’” (173). Unfortunately, Cavendish finds himself stuck in a retirement
home, where his attempts to escape cause him to be slapped and whipped. His
tone transitions from sarcastic to depressed, as he tells the reader “You will
not apply for membership, but the tribe of the elderly will claim you. Your
present will not keep pace with the world’s. This slippage will stretch your
skin, sag your skeleton, erode your hair and memory, make your skin turn opaque
so your twitching organs and blue-cheese veins will be semivisible” (180). The
harsh end to Cavendish’s story leaves the reader feeling dismayed but not
hopeless, which drives the reader to read further into the Cloud Atlas.
Within the
first question of Sonmi-451’s interview the reader is caught by her character.
The archivist who is interviewing her to record her story before her execution
simply states “On behalf of my ministry,
this isn’t an interrogation, or a trial. Your version of the truth is the only
one that matters;” yet Sonmi answers “Truth is singular. Its ‘versions’ are
mistruths” (185). Sonmi’s bold response to a simple statement by the archivist
draws the reader to explore her character. Sonmi’s distinction that “Truth is
singular” (185) displays her confidence and it sets the tone for the section. Sonmi’s
confidence may come from the fact that she is a fabricant, a clone designed to
work in a restaurant. Her ascension allows her to develop strong opinions,
which would likely conflict with the goals of the ruling body Unanimity. After
the statement that “Popular wisdom has it
that fabricants don’t have personalities. [Sonmi says] This fallacy is propagated for the comfort of
purebloods” (187). In a society with the ability to engineer any type of human
through coding of the genome, Sonmi threatens the hierarchal structure
determined by the perfection of one’s genes. The archivist understands her significance
and tries to draw a clear picture of her development into a sentient being
through questions; however, many of Sonmi’s most powerful statements come in
response to simple things the archivist states. Mitchell uses the archivist as
a springboard for Sonmi’s story to begin from, but Sonmi’s deviations from the
set questions display key qualities of her character. Sonmi’s internal
conflicts confuse her but when she asks her friend Hae-Joo “[…] how [she] might
remedy them. [Hae-Joo] replies ‘You don’t remedy them. You live through them’”
(233). Sonmi’s struggle to understand what it means to be a human highlights
key questions about the nature of humanity. The manner in which David Mitchell
uses a nonhuman character to challenge what it means to be human truly displays
the intricacy with which he took in constructing the novel.
Each section
of Cloud Atlas has its own unique
style. Cavendish’s sarcastic humor differs greatly from Sonmi’s serious tone.
Yet, they are both trapped without any hope for escape. The division of the
novel into sections causes the reader to see parallels between characters
separated by time and location. Although Mitchell’s division of the novel into
six separate stories is the most obvious stylistic technique, I felt it would
be better to address the connections between the characters and their stories at
a later point in the novel.
I really enjoyed reading your analysis Owen. Your inclusion of quotes to capture the nature of the style and characters of each story was particularly strong; it made the relationship between the characters and style very understandable. Additionally, the parallels and contrasts you noted were well thought out. Do you think that the author is using the parallels to suggest inherent qualities of human individuals and/or society? And did the author's style in these two stories seem to be more prominent than in the earlier stories?
ReplyDeleteGood discussion of the two main characters in this part of your reading, as well as the similarities between them and the reasons Mitchell has structured the book this way.
ReplyDeleteYou mention that Mitchell uses a nonhuman character to highlight questions of the nature of humanity. Do you mean that she isn't human at all?
As a warning, the next, and last new, section gets a little weird, with some more strange phrasing and word choice.
After reading your blog I found your analysis of Mitchell's style in the novel well done. It seems like Cavendish's section is written in a way I would really enjoy. I also like how you notice the similarities between the two characters. Is the book as weird as I have heard it is? Also (you may not have the answer now), but do you believe it is worth reading?
ReplyDeleteI did not mean to declare that Sonmi was not a human, rather I was trying to note how Mitchell used a character who is questioning her humanity, because she is a fabricant, to question what it means to be human. Thanks for the warning about the next section.
ReplyDeleteI think what you have to say about the shift in narration of each story is interesting as it helps the reader develop a better understanding of each character. However, how do you think this emphasizes some major themes of the novel as a whole? At this point what would you say some of these themes are? It's important to remember that regardless of the "multiple short story" style, Cloud Atlas is still a connected novel. What thoughts do you have on what these stories are trying to convey?
ReplyDelete